On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Sean Farley wrote: > Since the LGPL has not been taken to court, no legal precedence for it > has been set. Has something happened recently to change this?
This is true, but the fact that open-source developers start spreding this low-life kind of FUD about the LGPL is really, truely sickening. Of all the companies releasing _commercial_ software on Linux (more so, I might add, than on *BSD), none of them had issues linking against the LGPL. It's a sad day when the *BSD proponents attack the LGPL based on such disgusting FUD. I'm sorry for the strong language, but it pains me to see the discussion derailed in such a fashion. -- Dimi.
