> > True. So what we need is to add a function in the > testing framework > > so that tests can get argc/argv/envp. Seems like a > reasonable approach. > I was more thinking adding some wt_argc and wt_argv, with init in main > so that we don't have to deal with the portability issues of > the __argc, > __ ARGC...
Is there a reason we can't just use environment variables rather than argc/argv? I would think that would be less of a hassle than using argc/argv. .Geoff ----------------------------------------------------- Protect yourself from spam, use http://sneakemail.com
