On 29 Mar 2002, Geoffrey Hausheer wrote: > > > True. So what we need is to add a function in the > > testing framework > > > so that tests can get argc/argv/envp. Seems like a > > reasonable approach. > > I was more thinking adding some wt_argc and wt_argv, with init in main > > so that we don't have to deal with the portability issues of > > the __argc, > > __ ARGC... > > Is there a reason we can't just use environment variables > rather than argc/argv? I would think that would be less > of a hassle than using argc/argv.
The goal of some of these tests is precisely to check that what you get in argc/argv is what you expect. For instance, if the command line specified to CreateProcess is ... "a\"b\\" c\" d you would expect: argv[1] = [a"b\] argv[2] = [c"] argv[3] = [d] That would be hard to check without accessing argc/argv in some way. -- Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fgouget.free.fr/ Any sufficiently advanced Operating System is indistinguishable from Linux
