On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Michael Wetherell wrote: > On Thursday 07 November 2002 6:59 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > > On November 7, 2002 01:55 pm, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > What do you mean by "Debian maintainer", precisely? The most recent wine > > > package in Debian is version 0.0.20021007-1, uploaded October 20 by Ove > > > Kaaven. Has Ove indicated that he is no longer interested in maintaining > > > this package? (He has not so indicated to Debian!) Or do you have > > > something else in mind when referring to a "Debian maintainer"? > > > > Woops. My bad, I didn't realise Ove is the Debian maintainer. > > How silly of me, I'll correct that right away. > > Ah, that explains that. I've just been by the Debian site and realised that > there is still a maintainer, very much so, and I was about to ask what > exactly was it I'd volenteered for.
If you want, you or someone else could help by checking the Debian bugs on the package though; I don't know which bugs have been fixed in a later Wine release, nor did I ever get around to figure out the best way to forward such bugs to the used-to-be-rather-unorganized way of handling bugs (the one bug (which should be simple since it came with a patch) I did try to forward to wine-devel a year and a half ago had still not been resolved last time I looked). So, since I've been a little lazy about those bugs, I've been thinking about delegating responsibility for that to someone else, at a minimum. I haven't yet felt in need of filing a RFA or anything yet, though... (and the most recent package is 0.0.20021031-1, uploaded a couple of days ago)