Ove Kaaven wrote:

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Michael Wetherell wrote:


On Thursday 07 November 2002 6:59 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:

On November 7, 2002 01:55 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:

What do you mean by "Debian maintainer", precisely? The most recent wine
package in Debian is version 0.0.20021007-1, uploaded October 20 by Ove
Kaaven. Has Ove indicated that he is no longer interested in maintaining
this package? (He has not so indicated to Debian!) Or do you have
something else in mind when referring to a "Debian maintainer"?

Woops. My bad, I didn't realise Ove is the Debian maintainer.
How silly of me, I'll correct that right away.

Ah, that explains that. I've just been by the Debian site and realised that there is still a maintainer, very much so, and I was about to ask what exactly was it I'd volenteered for.

If you want, you or someone else could help by checking the Debian bugs on
the package though; I don't know which bugs have been fixed in a later
Wine release, nor did I ever get around to figure out the best way to
forward such bugs to the used-to-be-rather-unorganized way of handling
bugs (the one bug (which should be simple since it came with a patch) I
did try to forward to wine-devel a year and a half ago had still not been
resolved last time I looked). So, since I've been a little lazy about
those bugs, I've been thinking about delegating responsibility for that to
someone else, at a minimum. I haven't yet felt in need of filing a RFA or
anything yet, though... (and the most recent package is 0.0.20021031-1,
uploaded a couple of days ago)


I am not sure this is the best way but I would suggest that for each Debian bug in the you should start a bug in Wine's Bugzilla. (That is assuming the bug is actualy in wine in wine of course) you should provide a url link to the debian bug in wine and vice versa.

--

Tony Lambregts




Reply via email to