On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:49:34AM -0800, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > It's more efficient to do: > > > > sprintf(foo, "%s%s%s%s%s%s", bar1,bar2,bar3,bar4,bar5,bar6);
In case you cannot be 100% sure of the lengths, it might still be worth it
with snprintf, but otherwise, it's a matter of taste.
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know
what proactive means.
