Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well - still snprintf is more efficient.
I don't think so, but feel free to provide benchmarks. > But there is also no reason not to welcome these submissions if > someone already took the time to submit them. There's no objective reason why sprintf is better than strcat in that case, it's purely a matter of personal taste. As such, whoever writes the code in the first place gets to choose the way it's done. What if I apply that patch and someone sends a patch tomorrow changing the sprintfs back into strcats because he prefers that? Should I apply it? After all he took the time to submit it too... -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
