"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, depends on what you call "work" :))) I've attached what I had > in mind for a generic wineapploader script.
The problem I see with the symlink is that it's too fragile. As soon as you move/rename anything it breaks. Copying the script is already better, but I also think we should hardcode the app name instead of relying on $0, so that you can rename the script and it still works. > Also, should I delete the intermediate files? I think I should, > one can get to them by manually running winebuild. Yes, and you should use temp file names I think. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
