"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, in this case, why not merge winewrap into winebuild, and > maybe provide flags to do only certain steps, sort of like gcc? > > In fact, winebuild already follows this philosophy, so it seems > only natural. And we can avoid yet another small wrapper.
That would be a possibility, but you'd need some restructuring of winebuild to do that (or have it exec itself which doesn't seem very clean). I don't know, it feels cleaner to have a separate wrapper; I'd suggest doing at least the first version that way, and once things are cleared up maybe we can find a way to merge everything into winebuild cleanly. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
