Yes there should be. Currently execname.so is being created rather than execname.exe.so. The patch I submitted a few hours ago (don't know if it has made it through yet) includes a fix for this.
Copying the file is actually what I did for several weeks, rather than dig in to winemaker to fix the problem. But I get fed up and started putting together a patch for this several days ago. So now it is ready to roll. Good timing, yes? -- Jeff S
_________________________________________________________________From: Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Shouldn't there be a winemine-hcs.exe.so file there? If you rename winemine-hcs.so to winemine-hcs.exe.so, what happens? Shachar Hans Christian Studt wrote:It still cannot find 'winemine-hcs.exe'.
What seems to comes nearest is
-rwxr-xr-x 969 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs
-rwxrwxr-x 793446 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs.so
-rw-rw-r-- 44160 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs.spec.c
-rw-rw-r-- 92648 jan 1 21:00 winemine-hcs.spec.o
-rw-rw-r-- 173 jan 1 20:59 winemine.exe.dbg.c
-rw-rw-r-- 2040 jan 1 21:00 winemine.exe.dbg.o
-rw-rw-r-- 43665 jan 1 15:39 winemine.exe.spec.c
I sure hope someone can help out - because I plan to try to see if I can make some of those 7.000 win32 applications over at sourceforge.net compile under winelib.
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
