Jeff Smith wrote:
Yes there should be.  Currently execname.so is being created rather than
execname.exe.so.  The patch I submitted a few hours ago (don't know
if it has made it through yet) includes a fix for this.

Copying the file is actually what I did for several weeks, rather than
dig in to winemaker to fix the problem.  But I get fed up and started
putting together a patch for this several days ago.  So now it is ready
to roll.  Good timing, yes?
Thanks Jeff, Sylvain and Shachar - now I am rolling :-)

I will look into how to compile out of the CVS later.
--
Hans Christian Studt  : http://hc.studt.dk  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.dk og W3C standarder : http://w3c.studt.dk


Reply via email to