Vincent Béron wrote:
Le dim 26/01/2003 à 15:38, Tony Lambregts a écrit :LOL. So it seems that by default I am the current docbook "expert". That's almost scary.
If we cannot replace the <> around wineconf the burning question for me is what is the directive to tell the make process ignore <wineconfig> Does anyone have an idea? Vincent...?Define it somewhere as a noop? I'm not familiar at all with writing
docbook, I only played with the executable tools.
Oh well... This leaves us with two options. Both options require that we modifiy the config file.
Option 1: Since AFAICT <wineconfig> is just a comment that serves no real purpose we just get rid of it.
Option 2: wrap the config file in
<![CDATA[
....
]]>
<! [CDATA[ is a directive to ignore all tags untill ]]>. Unfortunately this needs to be embeded in the document that uses it or it won't work. So we have two ways of doing this. one way is to modify the config file so that they are in it (ugly) or we use a configure script to wrap <![CDATA[ and ]]> around the config and create a new file. (This is not something I know how to do, but if it is nessesary I am willing to learn)
My vote (for what its worth ) if <wineconf> is not needed lets just get rid of it.
--
Tony Lambregts
