"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On December 31, 2003 04:38 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> they were/are protected, but I think it should be removed from winegcc
>> because they don't do the Job.
>
> Maybe, I'm not sure. I'll let Alexandre comment on the ms-extensions.h
> idea. In general, he does not like non-standard headers...

No, I don't. Boaz, could you please explain a bit more why the
definitions in winegcc don't work for you?

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to