"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On December 31, 2003 04:38 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> they were/are protected, but I think it should be removed from winegcc >> because they don't do the Job. > > Maybe, I'm not sure. I'll let Alexandre comment on the ms-extensions.h > idea. In general, he does not like non-standard headers...
No, I don't. Boaz, could you please explain a bit more why the definitions in winegcc don't work for you? -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]