Yes it does! exactly the same.
Sorry! I checked, and double checked, by diffing against Last CVS. But I didn't realize winegcc went such a long way.


In any way I wish it would be an header. dllimport/dllexport gives me a warning even with -fms-extensions. In an header I could turn that off.
Also later today I will submit "uuidof" and "declspec ( property () )". These must go in an header, but they can
be on the side and manually included by those who needs them. Should I submit them to MinGW they might have use for them too.


Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:

On January 1, 2004 07:42 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:


In short __declspec( selectany ) && __declspec( thread )



These are supported just fine by winegcc, what's wrong with it? AFACT, it's supported exactly the same way as in your patch...






Reply via email to