On 7/3/06, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 23:58, you wrote:
> The case I care about most is:
> in cron, or ssh'ing in without X forwarding, use wcmd.exe to run a batch
> file.
>
> We need to be able to support both cases.
How about leaving wcmd.exe alone (or renaming it to winecmd.exe), and wait on
making cmd.exe until a replacement that behaves like Windows' cmd.exe, then?
You can have both that way. I'm mostly concerned about apps and/or people
that expect cmd.exe to behave like Windows' version, when Wine's wcmd.exe
doesn't.
Window's cmd.exe run under Wine seems to do exactly what wcmd.exe
currently does in that it runs in its original terminal without
creating a new console window. Creating the console to host cmd.exe is
likely ouside the scope of cmd.exe.
Also, running cmd.exe from within an instance of cmd.exe in Windows
does not open a new console window--using an existing console, be it
unix or dos, seems to be the right thing to do.
Thomas Kho