Mike McCormack wrote:
>
> Robert Shearman wrote:
>
>> I think we should leave the reference to the CVS tree page (but still
>> add a link to the Git tree). Some people find it easier to work with
>> CVS than Git.
>
>
> I think Alexandre would prefer to receive patch submissions in Git
> format, as they are easier to apply and waste less of his time.
But i also guess that he likes to receive more patches than less. For
the casual/new Wine patch submitter CVS is easier to use. If those
submitters do more Wine work they will see the light anyway and migrate
to git ;)
> My changes to the website reflect that support for CVS may not last
> forever...
Are there any plans to get rid of CVS? I would guess keeping the CVS
tree sync from the git tree is low maintanance so it can be kept around
"forewever".
bye
michael
--
Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
Sr. Network Engineer Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
