Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But i also guess that he likes to receive more patches than less. For > the casual/new Wine patch submitter CVS is easier to use. If those > submitters do more Wine work they will see the light anyway and migrate > to git ;)
More patches are good, but if they are in a broken format they are not really useful. And CVS unfortunately makes it much too easy to submit broken patches, so it's not necessarily better for new submitters. > Are there any plans to get rid of CVS? I would guess keeping the CVS > tree sync from the git tree is low maintanance so it can be kept around > "forewever". Yes, as long as it doesn't require any maintenance it will be kept around. But if it breaks for some reason, I'm not going to spend time fixing it. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
