Paul Vriens schrieb: > On 01/10/2010 05:44 PM, André Hentschel wrote: >> --- >> dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c | 3 ++- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c >> index 1bab21d..e351813 100644 >> --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c >> +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/om.c >> @@ -677,7 +677,8 @@ static void test_query_object(void) >> ok( status == STATUS_SUCCESS, "NtQueryObject failed %x\n", >> status ); >> ok( len> sizeof(UNICODE_STRING), "unexpected len %u\n", len ); >> str = (UNICODE_STRING *)buffer; >> - ok( sizeof(UNICODE_STRING) + str->Length + sizeof(WCHAR) == len, >> "unexpected len %u\n", len ); >> + ok( sizeof(UNICODE_STRING) + str->Length == len /* WinNT */ || >> + sizeof(UNICODE_STRING) + str->Length + sizeof(WCHAR) == len, >> "unexpected len %u\n", len ); >> trace( "got %s len %u\n", wine_dbgstr_w(str->Buffer), len ); >> pNtClose( handle ); >> } > > Looks a bit like: > > http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/57319 > > Except that I used broken() for NT4 which IMHO makes more sense as this > is the only platform with this issue. > Hi Paul, sorry didnt see your patch, it was not my purpose to compete for that. I also had broken() in mind, but using http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069721.html i am not sure.
-- Best Regards, André Hentschel
