On 01/10/2010 06:00 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
Hi Paul, sorry didnt see your patch, it was not my purpose to compete for that. I also had broken() in mind, but using http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069721.html i am not sure.
The 'problem' with broken() is that it just sounds bad. We also use broken() to force Wine to use a particular implementation. The fact that only NT4 has this issue makes it broken() in the sense that we want to follow the NT4+ implementation.
As said before maybe we need a deprecated() which is the same as broken() but just doesn't look as bad ;)
-- Cheers, Paul.
