Right, sorry, didn't mean to make it seem like there was nothing in place already. Buildbot just seems more easily extensible.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Arjun Comar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > --Buildbot-- > > To keep from seeming pedantic, I'll be brief with this one. Automating > > testing suites are awesome and help keep down the number of > bugs/regressions > > that pop up. It'd be really cool if Wine had something like this. > > To be clear, Wine *does* have something like this already, but > it's kind of fragmented, and only a few people know how > to run all the pieces. The value of Buildbot might be that > it's a popular system, so more people will be able to participate > in running more pieces of, and adding to, our automated build & test. > - Dan > Sorry about the confusion! -- Arjun Comar, Rose-Hulman '12
