That's the idea. AppInstall already runs a suite of tests on various windows applications, its a matter of integrating that with the current test suite and automating the whole process.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Andrew Fenn <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think it would hurt to run tests on the latest revisions > coming out. What might be more useful (and more complicated) is to > automate the building then running of popular windows programs on the > latest versions. When a failure is detected you could then run an > automated regression test to find the bad patch and submit it. > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Arjun Comar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Right, sorry, didn't mean to make it seem like there was nothing in place > > already. Buildbot just seems more easily extensible. > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Arjun Comar <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > --Buildbot-- > >> > To keep from seeming pedantic, I'll be brief with this one. Automating > >> > testing suites are awesome and help keep down the number of > >> > bugs/regressions > >> > that pop up. It'd be really cool if Wine had something like this. > >> > >> To be clear, Wine *does* have something like this already, but > >> it's kind of fragmented, and only a few people know how > >> to run all the pieces. The value of Buildbot might be that > >> it's a popular system, so more people will be able to participate > >> in running more pieces of, and adding to, our automated build & test. > >> - Dan > > > > > > Sorry about the confusion! > > -- > > Arjun Comar, Rose-Hulman '12 > > > > > > > > > -- Arjun Comar, Rose-Hulman '12
