On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Stefan Dösinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 01 September 2011 13:04:34 Henri Verbeet wrote: >> Did the tests start passing on fglrx then? > As far as I know they don't. But do they have to? > > If I remember correctly Dan's previous patchwatcher scripts kept track of > tests that were failing, so they didn't require a fully successful test run. > The important thing was that the tests succeeded or failed reliably. > > The new setup looks much less sophisticated in that regard
Right - I have not yet forward ported the code that tracks known failures. It hasn't been needed so far -- I've gotten away with a simple blacklist -- but once I start doing things like valgrinding, checking compiler warnings, or running on ATI I'll probably need to bring it back. - Dan
