On 1 September 2011 17:38, Stefan Dösinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 01 September 2011 13:04:34 Henri Verbeet wrote: >> Did the tests start passing on fglrx then? > As far as I know they don't. But do they have to? > If running those tests is the point of that machine, I'd say so. With a known broken configuration, you risk just running into the same known bugs every time you change something or add a new test, wasting everyone's time. An important consideration here is that apparently upstream isn't interested in fixing this kind of bug, and there's no way for us to fix them ourselves.
- buildbot status Dan Kegel
- Re: buildbot status Stefan Dösinger
- Re: buildbot status Dan Kegel
- Re: buildbot status Stefan Dösinger
- Re: buildbot status Dan Kegel
- Re: buildbot status Stefan Dösinger
- Re: buildbot status Henri Verbeet
- Re: buildbot status Dan Kegel
- Re: buildbot status Stefan Dösinger
- Re: buildbot status Dan Kegel
- Re: buildbot status Henri Verbeet
- Re: buildbot status Stefan Dösinger
- Re: buildbot status Stefan Dösinger
- Re: buildbot status Henri Verbeet
- Re: buildbot status Scott Ritchie
- Re: buildbot status Scott Ritchie
- buildbot status Dan Kegel
- Re: buildbot status Frédéric Delanoy
- Re: buildbot status Dan Kegel
- Re: buildbot status Damjan Jovanovic
- Re: buildbot status Dan Kegel
