On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Francois Gouget <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Dan Kegel wrote: >> Isn't this a no-op? I thought that an undefined symbol was >> treated as false by the preprocessor. > > Actually you may be right. But then this is the only place in Wine where > we rely on this and I see not reason to make this assumption. Even more > so since we don't for the other macros in the same test which makes this > locally inconsistent.
It feels funny to avoid using a basic feature of C... maybe we should remove the extra defined() calls.
