[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725208#action_12725208
]
Nick Gallardo commented on WINK-10:
-----------------------------------
Mike, do you mind if I merge this test with another test I had created for
polymorphic sub-resources?
> unnecessary constructor validation on subresource
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WINK-10
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-10
> Project: Wink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mike Rheinheimer
> Assignee: Nick Gallardo
> Attachments: patch.txt, patch_fixcandidate_01.txt
>
>
> Because a subresource does not have to conform to the JAX-RS rules regarding
> constructors, the code should not be enforcing these rules on subresources.
> Attached is a testcase to demo the problem. The hack I used to confirm that
> the runtime is enforcing the constructor rules on the subresource was to
> comment out the "continue L1;" call in
> AbstractMetadataCollector.parseConstructors
> The fix will be to make the AbstractMetadataCollector aware of what type of
> resource it is operating on; top-level resource vs. subresource.
> I'll work on this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
