[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731306#action_12731306
 ] 

Nadav Fischer commented on WINK-10:
-----------------------------------

Nick, you can resolve this issue without applying the patch because the fix for 
WINK-83 also fixes this issue.

> unnecessary constructor validation on subresource
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WINK-10
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-10
>             Project: Wink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Common, Server
>            Reporter: Mike Rheinheimer
>            Assignee: Nick Gallardo
>         Attachments: patch.txt, patch_fixcandidate_01.txt, 
> updated-patch-gallardo.txt
>
>
> Because a subresource does not have to conform to the JAX-RS rules regarding 
> constructors, the code should not be enforcing these rules on subresources.
> Attached is a testcase to demo the problem.  The hack I used to confirm that 
> the runtime is enforcing the constructor rules on the subresource was to 
> comment out the "continue L1;" call in 
> AbstractMetadataCollector.parseConstructors
> The fix will be to make the AbstractMetadataCollector aware of what type of 
> resource it is operating on; top-level resource vs. subresource.
> I'll work on this.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to