Great  to have you back : ) ... 
we have made a good progress toward 0.1 release


-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 3:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Wink 0.1 release

Okay I'm finally online and not distracted by unpacking and other  
muck.  Still syncing/groking wink emails I have them tagged but not  
yet dug through them.  Looks like a lot of good progress has gone on  
while I was moving :-)

--jason


On Jul 21, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:

> I'll 3rd the nomination.
>
> Jason, if you want to split duties and do technical/social release  
> managers, that's fine with me.
>
> -Nick
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> [email protected]
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <[email protected]>
>
>
> "Snitkovsky, Martin" <[email protected]>
> 07/20/2009 11:47 PM
> Please respond to
> [email protected]
>
> To
>
> Jason Dillon <[email protected]>, "wink- 
> [email protected]" <[email protected]>
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> RE: Wink 0.1 release
>       
>
> Jason,
> I will be happy to have you as a mentor :)
>
> martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryant Luk [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 1:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Wink 0.1 release
>
> Jason,
>
> Did you want to be (and have the time to be) the release manager for
> the 0.1 release?  I don't recall seeing any e-mail/JIRA comment saying
> "yea" or "nay".  I think Dims nominated you to be the release manager
> for 0.1 since you are one of the more experienced Apache committers.
> If not, no worries.
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Jason Dillon<[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> > On Jul 15, 2009, at 9:55 PM, Baram, Eliezer wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, I thought that "fix version/s" is the field to fill after an  
> issue is
> >> fixed to identify in which versions it was fixed.
> >> But if this the convention, fine with me.
> >
> > It is actually used for both.  When the issue is not resolved it  
> means its
> > targeted for fix in that version, when the issue is resolved, then  
> it is
> > fixed in that version.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> - Bryant Luk
>

Reply via email to