Eli, I'm just looking at the main page (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK) and there's a "0.1" link under "Versions".
Everything that we want to fix should be tagged as 0.1 for the "fix for" and it should appear under that list. -Nick Nicholas Gallardo WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development [email protected] Phone: 512-286-6258 Building: 903 / 5G-016 "Baram, Eliezer" <[email protected]> To 07/15/2009 09:38 "[email protected]" AM <[email protected]> cc Please respond to Subject wink-...@incubato RE: Wink 0.1 release r.apache.org Dims, is it possible to add something like "target version" field to Jira, so we can mark the issues we want to fix for 0.1? -----Original Message----- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Wink 0.1 release Nick, Team, First step is to vote in a Release Manager who knows how we do releases. I was hoping Jason would help us with his experience there. One more thing is for everyone to agree on a list of JIRA items that should get into the 0.1 release. So please go ahead and post a list to kick start that discussion. thanks, dims On 07/15/2009 10:20 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: > I too am anxious to see the 0.1 release go live. I've received a number of > requests and would like to get people playing with the runtime as soon as > possible. Here are some issues that should be addressed before the > release. > > * We have had some performance profiling work done on the runtime and found > a few issues that are affecting performance. I will open up JIRAs today > for those issues and would like to see those in 0.1 provided they are > accepted by the community. There are at least four issues that we know of > right now. > > * Dims/Kevan, do incubator projects publish release candidates? If so, I'd > like to see at least one RC published before we cut the final release. > > * Bryant/Jesse/Mike have opened JIRAs for the remaining work to port over > the IBM integration test bucket. I'd like to see those JIRAs completed > before we ship (hopefully finished by Friday). > > * The developer's guide has great content for developing the actual > applications. We need some content on the wiki with specific examples for > how to take the build output, and package it up into a WAR. What's > common-place to us is not to users and a little more hand holding is > necessary. Maybe a specific example of how to build the WAR for deployment > on Geronimo or Tomcat. > > -Nick > > > > Nicholas Gallardo > WebSphere - REST& WebServices Development > [email protected] > Phone: 512-286-6258 > Building: 903 / 5G-016 > > > > Bryant Luk > <bryant....@gmail > .com> To > [email protected] > 07/15/2009 08:18 cc > AM > Subject > Re: Wink 0.1 release > Please respond to > wink-...@incubato > r.apache.org > > > > > > > > I think we should look at the issues in JIRA first and address as many > as we can that are related to the server/client/common component (i.e. > identify ones that are going to be 0.1 or are going to be later). I > hope that we are finished porting the main integration test cases by > the end of this week. > > In particular: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-34 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-76 > > In addition, any remaining spec related issues. I think most of these > are taken care of but will need to look at the list. I don't know all > the rules behind claiming TCK compliance, but I think we should also > take another pass at the TCK since there were significant (and IMO > correct) changes made. > > Also, I think Nick had a few issues he wanted to get in. > > I am also anxious for a release but I think we have to take care of > some of these first. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Michael Elman<[email protected]> wrote: >> I also think that Wink is ready for 0.1 >> Should we start formal voting? >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin< >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I agree that adoption wise it is *highly* important to release 0.1 as > soon >>> as we can. >>> >>> We already got few requests from inside HP to consume Wink. >>> The first questions was "when you are going to publish first stable >>> release/build?". >>> >>> Does someone have rough estimation on how long it can take to go from >>> incubator snapshot to 0.1 release? >>> >>> --martin >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Baram, Eliezer >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:22 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Wink 0.1 release >>> >>> Hi >>> Now, when Wink is JAX-RS compliant, have a build environment and all the >>> resources are licensed under Apache license, it's time we discuss > releasing >>> Wink 0.1. Having a released version of Wink is an important step of > adoption >>> Wink by users and enlarging the community and I think we should have one > as >>> early as possible. >>> >>> What are the things that you think that must be handled before we can >>> release Wink 0.1? >>> I have two: >>> >>> 1) Removing Symphony references from the entire SDK. >>> >>> 2) Validate that the documentation is still accurate after the > changes >>> we enter the SDK in the last period. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> --Eli >>> >>> >>> > > > > -- > > - Bryant Luk >
