Application files are internal to Wink or part of the JAX-RS spec? It
looked like they were properties files and can be adorned with a legal
header.
javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate is only to contain a single line of a
class name to load. I am not sure if the spec allows for adorning a
header here.
It would be nice to resolve the application files if we can and then
can leave the javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate asis. Geronimo has a
few of these spec files that contain only classes which we just ignore
when RAT complains.
--jason
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
I have run Wink sources/binaries dists through "Apache RAT" (see
attached RAT reports)
The only problem that I succeeded to identify was missing Apache
License Headers in javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate & application
files. But maybe I miss-interpreted the reports.
Sources dist:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT-src.zip
Binaries dist:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-wink-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
Latest stable release of RAT: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
rat/
Martin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Snitkovsky, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
I will check it
-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
Anyone ran the dists through "Apache RAT"? http://incubator.apache.org/rat/
thanks,
dims
On 07/27/2009 09:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Yes, we need to make sure the published zip/tgz + jars have the
required
incubator disclaimers.
--jason
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
Makes sense to me... +1
I don't know if this is the best place to talk about it, but in
going
through the Incubator release policy stuff, I noticed that there
are a
few items like an Incubating Disclaimer
(http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
)
that need to be included. Release Notes would fall under that
category
as well.
-N
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
[email protected]
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
"Snitkovsky, Martin" <[email protected]>
"Snitkovsky, Martin" <[email protected]>
07/21/2009 08:52 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc
Subject
[DISCUSS] Wink distribution Layout
I would like to discuss Wink distribution layout.
The Incubator
insists<http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
that artifacts for {podling} are contained within
www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}<http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7bpodling%7d
>.
A podling is free to choose a suitable layout for its released
artifacts.
My proposal for Wink distribution layout is as follows:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/wink
- Version (e.g. '0.1-incubating')
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.zip
o apache-wink-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
o apache-wink-src-0.1-incubating.tar.gz
apache-wink-0.1-incubating.zip will be in the same layout as
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/wink/wink-dist/0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wink-dist-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip
What do you think?
--martin
<report_src.xml><report_bin.xml>
