The problem with the names being long is that Windows users may encounter issues when unzipping the source zips. I think the path limit is around 255 characters. There's around 50 characters in the c:\documents and settings\administrator\desktop\ already.
I've updated the pom.xml name elements so that during the Maven build it looks better. I think the artifactIds were properly updated but please let me know if you see differently. On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jason Dillon<[email protected]> wrote: > Why did the name need shortening? We should try to keep atrifactId's > consistent with the directory name they are defined in. Its a best > practice. > > --jason > > > On Aug 8, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote: > >> >> Kevan, a few responses to some of the issues. >> >>> >>> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, >> >> Bryant fixed this before it was moved to "wink-itest" to shorten the name. >> >>> I assume that we have run the release binaries through the TCK? >> >> Michael Elman ran the TCK on the tag. Everything was good. >> >> There are JIRAs opened for the other issues you mentioned. >> >> -N >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:12:35 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 0.1 >> >> >> On Aug 5, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 0.1 >>> >>> The Maven staging area is at: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/ >>> >>> The distributions are in: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/wink-staging-014/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/0.1-incubating/ >>> >>> This release is tagged at: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/ >>> >>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1 >> >> >> As noted by Sebb, the top-level svn src directory needs to include the >> LICENSE and NOTICE files. IMO, it should also include the DISCLAIMER and >> README/RELEASE-NOTES. >> >> The SVN tag contains src/doc/release_notes.txt. However, the src >> distribution does not. The src distribution does have license and notice >> files in top-level, directory, though... >> >> The file, >> wink-integration-test/wink-server-integration-test/wink-jaxrs-optional-providers/pom.xml, >> does not have an Apache source license header. It should. >> >> Otherwise, the source looks good and build worked well for me. >> >> I note that release_notes.txt states that "Apache Wink is TCK compliant >> implementation of the JAX-RS v1.0 specification." I assume that we have run >> the release binaries through the TCK? >> >> The binary distribution contains two source jars: >> >> lib/jaxb-api-2.1-sources.jar >> lib/jaxb-impl-2.1.4-sources.jar >> >> You cannot distribute these sources. >> >> Finally, have the licenses of the included binaries (lib/*.jar) been >> properly reviewed and documented, if required? Certainly the CDDL license >> for the JAXB jars is missing. I can only guess that there are others... >> >> Here's my -1 until the above issues have been resolved. >> >> --kevan >> >> >> > > -- - Bryant Luk
