I'm trying to remember the source, but cannot right now. Could be that I misinterpreted something and am just spreading mis-information.
Kevan, etc., do you have any knowledge to the contrary? -Nick Nicholas Gallardo WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development [email protected] Phone: 512-286-6258 Building: 903 / 5G-016 Davanum Srinivas <[email protected] m> To [email protected] 08/12/2009 09:15 cc PM Subject Re: JAX-RS Stack comparison(s) Please respond to wink-...@incubato r.apache.org Nick, Where did you get this information from? "If we cannot release a 1.0 from the incubator" I don't believe seeing it anywhere. thanks, dims On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Nicholas Gallardo<[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Bryant's comment that we're closer to a 1.0 than perception indicates. If we cannot release a 1.0 from the incubator, this is something we're going to have to fight regularly. > >> So why is it better than Jersey, Restlet or CXF? > > Now that we're closing out 0.1, let's use this question to help shape what we're doing in the next release (and beyond). Personally, I don't think it's healthy to get into a line-by-line comparison from within this community. I'll leave that to those doing their own evaluation and would rather our work stood for itself. > > We have said since the beginning that we wanted to focus on simplicity, ease of integration and a light footprint. Can we use those as themes to derive the next actions and create a project and community that is different enough from other options that we don't have to make it known via a list? > > -N > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Bryant Luk <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1:43:49 PM > Subject: Re: JAX-RS Stack comparison(s) > > I would suggest looking at: > http://incubator.apache.org/wink/docs/Apache_Wink_User_Guide.pdf for > the above and beyond JAX-RS features. The source code base is also of > course Apache licensed compared to Jersey/Restlet. Compared to CXF, > Wink is specifically focused on REST applications (which can be a good > or bad thing depending on what you want). I don't know how extensible > Jersey/Restlet are, but I think Wink is simple to extend and customize > if need be. > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas<[email protected]> wrote: >> Team, >> >> Here's some feedback on twitter....so WDYT? Why/How are we better than the >> competition? >> >> @mraible - tried Apache Wink? - http://incubator.apache.org/wink/ >> @dims Nope, but a 0.1 release in incubation doesn't seem like something I >> should recommend to clients. ;-) >> @mraible - i understand. but fyi, they did pass the JAX-RS TCK - >> http://bit.ly/SjRTx >> @dims So why is it better than Jersey, Restlet or CXF? >> >> thanks, >> dims >> > > > > -- > > - Bryant Luk > > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
