I'll also try disabling the wink-itests since I don't think we need those artifacts in a release.
Also, I looked at the wink-assembly output versus wink-scripts and I think it's pretty much the same now. If there are any differences, I'll report back but I think we should only release one of them. On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Bryant Luk <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we'll need to apply the remaining JIRAs for JAX-RS 1.1 namely: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-195 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-196 > > and switch over to the JAX-RS 1.1 API JAR as well. Mike, do you want > me to make the switch? > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> All, >> >> It's about that time again. With the number of fixes that have gone in and >> some of the JAX-RS 1.1 work that has already been done, the time is right >> to start marching toward a next release. >> >> I propose that we cut a Wink 1.1 release with the set of fixes we have >> today, along with the completed JAX-RS 1.1 work now that the TCK is >> available. Also, a run through the existing JIRAs for items of interest >> would be useful as well. >> >> Any thoughts on the release in general or on work that should be included? >> >> -Nick >> >> >
