> Also, I looked at the wink-assembly output versus wink-scripts and I
> think it's pretty much the same now. If there are any differences,
> I'll report back but I think we should only release one of them.
+1 for simplifying this.
Bryant Luk
<bryant....@gmail
.com> To
[email protected]
03/03/2010 01:35 cc
PM
Subject
Re: [DISCUSS] wink 1.1 release
Please respond to
wink-...@incubato
r.apache.org
I'll also try disabling the wink-itests since I don't think we need
those artifacts in a release.
Also, I looked at the wink-assembly output versus wink-scripts and I
think it's pretty much the same now. If there are any differences,
I'll report back but I think we should only release one of them.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Bryant Luk <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we'll need to apply the remaining JIRAs for JAX-RS 1.1 namely:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-195
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-196
>
> and switch over to the JAX-RS 1.1 API JAR as well. Mike, do you want
> me to make the switch?
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> It's about that time again. With the number of fixes that have gone in
and
>> some of the JAX-RS 1.1 work that has already been done, the time is
right
>> to start marching toward a next release.
>>
>> I propose that we cut a Wink 1.1 release with the set of fixes we have
>> today, along with the completed JAX-RS 1.1 work now that the TCK is
>> available. Also, a run through the existing JIRAs for items of interest
>> would be useful as well.
>>
>> Any thoughts on the release in general or on work that should be
included?
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>
