I forgot to throw in my +1 in the original note.  Absent Mike's vote, that
makes three votes.

Barring any dissenting opinions in the next day or so Mike, tag, you're
it.  :)

-Nick





                                                                       
             Bryant Luk                                                
             <bryant....@gmail                                         
             .com>                                                      To
                                       [email protected]   
             03/03/2010 01:40                                           cc
             PM                                                        
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: [VOTE] Mike Rheinheimer for 
             Please respond to         release manager                 
             wink-...@incubato                                         
               r.apache.org                                            
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




I'll throw in my +1 as well then. :P  Thanks Mike.

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Don't know if it's cool to vote for myself or not... :)
>
> mike
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Jesse A Ramos <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> From:
>> Nicholas L Gallardo/Austin/i...@ibmus
>> To:
>> [email protected]
>> Date:
>> 03/03/2010 01:29 PM
>> Subject:
>> [VOTE] Mike Rheinheimer for release manager
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We've rotated release manager duties for a while now, and I don't think
>> Mike's had the pleasure.  So, I'd like to nominate Mike for Wink 1.x
>> release manager.
>>
>> Please vote: +1 (yes), +0 (indifferent) or -1 (no)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to