I exported it out but Shiva's requeted improvements require us to manually edit/change a few things I believe.
2010/4/26 Baram, Eliezer <[email protected]>: > The apache wink developer guide is generated out of the wiki > (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WINK/Apache+Wink+Developer+Guide) > there is no need for PDF editor just export the whole section with sub pages > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryant Luk [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 > > I think we can accommodate 2) and 3) but for 1), do you have a PDF > editor that you can manually do the improvements to? I don't have a > PDF editor. All I can do is delete pages out of a PDF as far as I > know. > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Shiva Kumar H R <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Mike. I have created the following JIRAs for the same: >> 1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-276 : Improvements to >> docs\Apache_Wink_User_Guide.pdf in v1.1 release >> 2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-277 : Mention about >> ext\MultiPart sample in examples\readme.txt >> 3) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-278 : Consistent naming >> convention for Wink distributions >> >> Thanks, >> Shiva Kumar H R >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Shiva, >>> >>> Good suggestions. I don't know how much work it would be to change >>> the names under the wink-assembly module, or if it would require a new >>> module. Anyone else have an opinion about this? I personally like >>> the intuitive name we had previously used in Wink 1.0 release. I >>> imagine other projects will not use the assembly jars in their pom >>> dependencies, but certainly people that have a need for the full Wink >>> release would more likely look for it under the name >>> "apache-wink-1.1-incubating" than something with the word "assembly" >>> in it. >>> >>> Regarding the docs, can you open jira(s) for those? The PDF is >>> generated from the wiki. Maybe something got edited or some setting >>> got changed the broke the export? >>> >>> Thanks Shiva. >>> mike >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Shiva Kumar H R <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Now that there is a veto and there will be a new Release Candidate, >>> please >>> > consider the following as well: >>> > >>> > 1) The distributions are named as wink-assembly-dist-1.1-incubating* >>> while >>> > they were named as apache-wink-1.0-incubating* previously. Wouldn't a >>> > consistent naming convention be better? >>> > >>> > 2) In docs\Apache_Wink_User_Guide.pdf : >>> > a) The v1.0 pdf guide had a very attractive starting page, and this is >>> > missing in v1.1 guide. >>> > b) In the Chapter Bookmarks of v1.1 guide, the first entry says "Space >>> > Details", which is unnecessary and hence should be removed. And the root >>> of >>> > the tree is labelled as "Available Pages" while in v1.0 it used to be >>> > appropriately labelled as "Apache Wink Developer Guide Contents". >>> > c) The Chapter Bookmarks used to be shown by default in v1.0 guide, >>> while >>> > it isn't in v1.1 guide. >>> > >>> > 3) apache-wink-1.1-incubating\examples\readme.txt doesn't mention about >>> > ext\MultiPart sample (this was missed out in v1.0 release as well). >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Shiva Kumar H R >>> > >>> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Michael Elman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Sorry to be the bad guy. But due to >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-275 >>> >> I'll vote -1. >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > +1 from me. >>> >> > >>> >> > As of this reply, we're up to: >>> >> > >>> >> > [5 ] +1 (3 binding, 2 non-binding) >>> >> > [ ] +0 >>> >> > [ ] -1 >>> >> > >>> >> > Ideally, I'd like to see all committers vote. Please submit your vote >>> >> > if you've not yet done so! Thanks! >>> >> > >>> >> > mike >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected] >>> > >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > (I sent this email 10:00pm US CST April 22, but nobody got it. >>> Don't >>> >> > > know what happened, but I'm resending it now.) >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Hi Winkers, >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 >>> >> > > >>> >> > > The Maven staging area is at: >>> >> > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-014/ >>> >> > > >>> >> > > The distributions are in: >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-014/org/apache/wink/wink-assembly-dist/1.1-incubating/ >>> >> > > >>> >> > > This release is tagged at: >>> >> > > >>> >> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating >>> >> > > (revision 937139) >>> >> > > >>> >> > > The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours. I'll keep the >>> vote >>> >> > > open until Tuesday May 27 at 8:00am US CST (93 hours) since the >>> >> > > weekend is here. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Please make special note of the language used to describe JAX-RS >>> >> > > specification compliance in the >>> >> > > apache-wink-1.1-incubating/docs/Apache_Wink_User_Guide.pdf and >>> >> > > apache-wink-1.1-incubating/release_notes.txt files. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Guide to testing staged releases: >>> >> > > >>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html >>> >> > > >>> >> > > [ ] +1 >>> >> > > [ ] +0 >>> >> > > [ ] -1 >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Thanks! >>> >> > > mike >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >
