Looks like we have some agreement. Since I made the proposal I don't mind trying my hand at being the release manager this time around. I'm interested in going through the process and learning how it's done. Let me know if anyone has any issues, otherwise I can get started on this soon.
-- Jesse From: Bryant Luk <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 06/10/2010 07:06 AM Subject: Re: Wink 1.1.1 release +1 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree. > > +1 > > mike > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Nicholas Gallardo > <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1, a service release is in order. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Jesse A Ramos <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed, June 9, 2010 3:37:14 PM >> Subject: Wink 1.1.1 release >> >> Hi, >> >> At this point I think it would be good to start thinking about doing a >> 1.1.1 release of Wink. I know we've had a number of fixes go in since 1.1 >> and I've seen some messages on the mailing list asking specifically to get >> some of them into an official release. >> >> I propose that we start working towards a Wink 1.1.1 release. Any >> thoughts on this and if we have any other major items that should be >> included? >> >> -- Jesse >> >> >> >> >
