I endorse your proposal. :) Yeah, it would be good to have a few people go through the release management process. It's an experience.
By the way, I really tried to improve the wiki when I did it, so hopefully that'll be a real help. Feel free to email me any questions. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WINK/Apache+Wink+Release+Management mike On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Jesse A Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks like we have some agreement. > > Since I made the proposal I don't mind trying my hand at being the release > manager this time around. I'm interested in going through the process and > learning how it's done. Let me know if anyone has any issues, otherwise I > can get started on this soon. > > -- Jesse > > > > > > From: > Bryant Luk <[email protected]> > To: > [email protected] > Date: > 06/10/2010 07:06 AM > Subject: > Re: Wink 1.1.1 release > > > > +1 > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Agree. >> >> +1 >> >> mike >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Nicholas Gallardo >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1, a service release is in order. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Jesse A Ramos <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wed, June 9, 2010 3:37:14 PM >>> Subject: Wink 1.1.1 release >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> At this point I think it would be good to start thinking about doing a >>> 1.1.1 release of Wink. I know we've had a number of fixes go in since > 1.1 >>> and I've seen some messages on the mailing list asking specifically to > get >>> some of them into an official release. >>> >>> I propose that we start working towards a Wink 1.1.1 release. Any >>> thoughts on this and if we have any other major items that should be >>> included? >>> >>> -- Jesse >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
