On Jun 14, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > ... and another thing. Auto-add of licence would not also > auto-commit. I don't think anyone would want that. So this type of > feature in the rat-plugin would only be a slight help vs. a simple > report of a missing header. It saves the tiny bit of time it would > take to hand-edit the offending file.
I have no experience with google license header. I can't imagine that auto-add would be a good feature to have (certainly not one to base a decision on, one way or another). Fail the build if a header is missing -- that seems like plenty of incentive... I'll run RAT on a release, regardless... --kevan
