Certainly it is a useful tool, and will become better as time goes on,
especially since it's an Apache project.  I just don't think it's
quite there yet versus the Google license header plugin.  It'll get
there, and hopefully soon, though I have yet to see any activity on my
Jiras from several weeks ago.  So it goes..

mike


On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
>
>> ... and another thing.  Auto-add of licence would not also
>> auto-commit.  I don't think anyone would want that.  So this type of
>> feature in the rat-plugin would only be a slight help vs. a simple
>> report of a missing header.  It saves the tiny bit of time it would
>> take to hand-edit the offending file.
>
> I have no experience with google license header. I can't imagine that 
> auto-add would be a good feature to have (certainly not one to base a 
> decision on, one way or another). Fail the build if a header is missing -- 
> that seems like plenty of incentive...
>
> I'll run RAT on a release, regardless...
>
> --kevan

Reply via email to