Thanks Mike. Agreed on what's needed to make this a separate project. Mentors, can we release a separate module from our existing project to streamline this and keep it separate from the Wink runtime release cycle?
-Nick ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 10:36:09 AM Subject: Re: A new JSON model Thanks for your encouragement, Han. Unfortunately, it's not so simple to create a new standalone project in Apache and push a release of a new project through the system. That is, at a very minimum, probaby two months of work, which asssumes all of the Apache mentors are in place and approvals occur as efficiently as possible. A good end goal for JSON4J would be to eventually become a standalone project, but there has to be some traction (good usage, good community involvement, lots of interest, mentors, Apache incubator PMC +1 votes, lots of process and proposals) just to become a podling (incubator project), must less get a real release out the door. Your interest and regular involvement in Wink will certainly help with that, and we welcome it! Thanks, mike On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Han Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 We have the same json.org license issue with Apache Shindig. This > library > would be a great replacement and it'd be even better if the library can be > a > standalone in Apache outside of WINK. Could you please make the jar a full > release (e.g. not SNAPSHOT) since it is a requirement for Shindig to > consume > the library. > Thank you very much!!! > Han > -- > View this message in context: >http://apache-wink-dev.3470905.n2.nabble.com/A-new-JSON-model-tp5614930p5615278.html >l > Sent from the Apache Wink Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
