I'd let the dust settle down...when is the next release BTW? Please make sure 
you fill up a software grant as well.

thanks,
dims

On 10/08/2010 11:45 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote:
Thanks Mike.  Agreed on what's needed to make this a separate project.

Mentors, can we release a separate module from our existing project to
streamline this and keep it separate from the Wink runtime release cycle?

-Nick


----- Original Message ----
From: Mike Rheinheimer<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 10:36:09 AM
Subject: Re: A new JSON model

Thanks for your encouragement, Han.

Unfortunately, it's not so simple to create a new standalone project in
Apache and push a release of a new project through the system.  That is, at
a very minimum, probaby two months of work, which asssumes all of the Apache
mentors are in place and approvals occur as efficiently as possible.  A good
end goal for JSON4J would be to eventually become a standalone project, but
there has to be some traction (good usage, good community involvement, lots
of interest, mentors, Apache incubator PMC +1 votes, lots of process and
proposals) just to become a podling (incubator project), must less get a
real release out the door.

Your interest and regular involvement in Wink will certainly help with that,
and we welcome it!

Thanks,
mike


On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Han Nguyen<[email protected]>  wrote:


+1 We have the same json.org license issue with Apache Shindig. This
library
would be a great replacement and it'd be even better if the library can be
a
standalone in Apache outside of WINK. Could you please make the jar a full
release (e.g. not SNAPSHOT) since it is a requirement for Shindig to
consume
the library.
Thank you very much!!!
Han
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wink-dev.3470905.n2.nabble.com/A-new-JSON-model-tp5614930p5615278.html
l
Sent from the Apache Wink Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.






Reply via email to