[Winona Online Democracy]

Dear Colleagues,

This is the first newsletter from Digital Governance Initiative
http://www.digitalgovernance.org in 2004 and we wish you a full 
of learnings and imaginative year ahead!

The theme of this newsletter is - Increasing "Public Value" of 
Information through Electronic Governance Models.  We explain why 
Governments becoming online" does not always mean Good Governance. 
Instead Good Governance occurs when Electronic Governance is able to 
enhance the "Public Value" of information supplied. 

To those who joined recently, I wish to inform that Digital 
Governance Initiative http://www.digitalgovernance.org is a global, 
voluntary network aimed at identifying, researching and propagating 
innovative electronic governance models that are applicable in 
developing countries. Since its initiation in 2000 it has assisted 
several organizations in their egovernance related projects.

The website http://www.digitalgovernance.org is becoming a portal to 
Egovernance related Case-Studies, Publications, Events, Forums, Jobs 
and other activities in developing countries. This newsletter is 
subscribed by over 2600 colleagues and new readers can subscribe to 
this free newsletter by sending a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

I hope that Digital Governance Initiative can push forward the 
thinking that Electronic Governance has to be viewed as a governance 
reform process which requires both political will and demands from 
the civil society. Further, Electronic Governance in developing 
countries has to be used as a development tool to provide benefits 
of good governance to cross-sections of the society and especially 
to those who so far have been bypassed of benefits of governance. 

To those interestd, we will shortly be initiating our national 
Digital Governance Networks in Ghana, Nigeria and Nepal this year to 
foster national-level dialogues on egovernance. For more information 
on these networks and how to participate in them, see 
http://65.110.68.184/artman/publish/network.shtml 

Your suggestions on how we can incorporate the learnings from 
Digital Governance Initiative into specific egovernance activities 
taken up by governments in developing countries, and any new 
resources worth highlighting on Digital Governance website and 
newsletter will be most appreciated.

Please write to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I wish you a happy reading and learning.

Best,

Vikas Nath
Founder, DigitalGovernance.org and KnowNet.org Initiative
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.vikasnath.org

---------------------------------------
Newsletter 5. January 2004. 
---------------------------------------

Content

A. Increasing "Public Value" of Information through Electronic 
Governance Models.  

B. New Resources Added: Case-Studies, Publications, Events, Jobs 
relating to Electronic Governance in developing countries
 
***

A.  Increasing "Public Value" of Information through Electronic 
Governance Models. 

There is no dispute that "Electronic Governance" is gradually 
entering the domain of public administration concepts and strategies 
in developing countries. (or, in what we term as the broader 
governance sphere)

In spite of the best intentions to make Electronic Governance work 
for people- by providing them with easy access to governance 
products and services with which they can enhance their quality of 
lives, the end-results are often very different. 


i. Governments around the globe are becoming online

Many developing countries are now implementing a general policy to 
make available government information electronically to 
the "public". For instance, countries including Angola, Ethiopia, 
Guinea, Lao PDR, Malawi, Moldova, Niger, Qatar, Togo and Yemen have 
recently committed to Electronic Governance by taking steps to make 
government information available online. 

According to the UNPAN Report on "Benchmarking E-government: A 
Global Perspective", in 2001, of the 190 UN Member States, 169 
(88.9%), of their national governments used the internet in some 
capacity to deliver information and services. 
http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan003984.
pdf 

Governments registering an online presence is a progressive step 
from the situation where even the most basic of government 
information is confined to government bureaucrats and departments 
that are logistically and administratively inaccessible to the 
public. Under earlier situations, there is a high transaction cost 
(in terms of time, efforts and opportunities lost) to access timely 
and relevant government information, which governments turning 
online can "potentially" reduce. 


ii. Is Government becoming online leading to increase in "Public 
Value" of information provided?

Governments have always been providing information through means 
such as government notifications, newspapers and radio/ TV 
broadcasts. Providing the same information electronically through 
Internet is a significant step in making such information more 
easily accessible to the "public" but does not necessarily reflect 
governance reform or a political change within the government.

Countries such as Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Benin, 
Cambodia, Cote D��Ivoire, Cuba, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, Kyrgystan, 
Mongolia,  Nepal, Nigeria, Uganda, Vietnam and Zimbabwe, for 
instance, maintain official government websites on the Internet with 
provide information to the "public". (See the Digital Governance 
Initiative website at http://www.digitalgovernance.org to access 
official websites of these countries).

There is no doubt that maintaining these websites have positive 
utilities. Yet it would be imprudent to state that -maintaining an 
online government presence has significantly enhanced the flow of 
government information of "value" to the public. 

As a governance information user, the key question which concerns me 
is:

Is Electronic Governance providing me with information which is 
of "value" to me and that I can use for my private benefit?

We now introduce a term - "Public Value" of information - to 
understand the difference between information being provided and 
information of "value" to the public being provided by the 
governments. 

ii.1 Public Value of Information

Public Value of information refers to the "value" of the information 
being provided, as determined by the public. 

PV == v(1) +v(2) + v(3) + v(4) + ... v(i) + ... + vN

Where,         N is the number of people reached by the governance sphere
And,         v(i) is the value derived from the public information by an 
individual i
 
Thus public value of information will increase when:

* More number of people are brought under the governance 
sphere [increasing the N]

* More relevant government information is provided to each 
individual [increasing the v(i)]


iii. Two Lessons: How can Electronic Governance increase 
the "Public Value" of Information? 

For Electronic Governance to increase the "public value" of 
information, planned efforts have to be made to provide information 
which is of use to larger number of individuals. Two key lessons 
emerge:


Lesson 1: 
Electronic Governance models will have to be designed to provide 
governance information which is of "value" for end-users, instead of 
providing information that can be readily supplied by the 
governments. 

Governance information will have more "value" for me, when 
information is:

i. CUSTOMIZED :  Is  useful for my information needs
ii. TIMELY         : Updated information is readily 
available when required
iii. TRUSTWORTHY : Is usable, and individuals/ 
institutions can be held accountable for any wrong information 
provided

At present, a fundamental flaw exists- Governments turning online 
are providing governance information along sectoral lines, for 
instance agriculture ministry, water-resources ministry, mining 
ministry, industrial development ministry and rural development 
ministry are each bringing more information about their ministry 
online. Information requirements of end-users are however more 
geographically inclined rather than sectorally. 

For instance a farmer is not interested in what government schemes 
and subsidies are offered by agriculture department, rural 
development department and water-resources department. Instead his / 
her need may be to know schemes and subsidies that are available in 
his/ her area irrespective of which department they comes from. Thus 
Electronic Governance models needs to take into cognizance this 
interface where specific user requirements get matched with 
information availability. 

  
Lesson 2:                   

Electronic Governance models should try to reach those sections of 
the society who have been bypassed and remained out of governance 
sphere due to high transaction costs of accessing governance 
information. And yet the need for governance information for these 
sections of society may be the highest.

Due to high transaction cost of gaining governance information, 
several sections of the community, for instance, small and landless 
farmers, urban poor, tribal and backward communities, minorities, 
unemployed rural youths, often remain outside of governance sphere 
and remain unaware of governance information which could be useful 
for them- for instance information about government schemes and 
subsidies, credit and loans availability, employment opportunities, 
new bills and notifications etc.

When Electronic Governance models are specifically designed to serve 
information needs of these marginalized communities, they bring more 
number of people into governance sphere and thereby increase 
the "public value" of information being provided by the governments. 

When the above 2 lessons are followed, the Electronic Governance 
models become a catalyst to efforts towards good governance.

See the example of Egovernance for farmers in China in Quzhzou 
http://www.developmentgateway.org/download/221732/NJ110_ITG_Case.pdf 
 or the Naga City Egovernance http://www.naga.gov.ph/cityservices/ 
in Philippines or the Vishakapatnam Municipal Corporation (India). 
http://www.visakhapatnammunicipalcorporation.org/  In all these 
cases, the focus of e-governance services is geographically rooted 
in a small area and there is an increased focus to identify and 
design governance services that will be useful for cross-section of 
the community. (See http://www.digitalgovernance.org for 
links to their websites and other information)

***

B. New Resources Added on the Digital Governance Website

CASE-STUDIES
Browse 105 case-studies on DigitalGovernance.org Case-Studies 
section at:
http://65.110.68.184/artman/publish/casestudies.shtml 

Recent Additions: 

India: SWAGAT- State Wide Attention on Grievances by Application of 
Technology
[ http://newsletter.gujarat.gov.in/vol2/NewsletterDec03.pdf ]
To see that the aggrived person does not have to come all the way to 
the capital of the State, it is also desirable to put up a system at 
the local level to resolve the grievances and monitor the same with 
IT tools.

Lebanon: Thousands of Government Forms Available from a Single 
Access Point
[ http://www.microsoft.com/resources/casestudies/CaseStudy.asp?
CaseStudyID=363 ]
A team of reformers went "underground" into all the corners of 
Lebanon's 21 ministries and 44 agencies in search of every 
government form. The paper documents were digitized and placed 
together on a Web portal called Informs. Citizens can now access any 
form over the Internet, or over the telephone through a four-digit 
hotline, so they no longer get lost in the bureaucracy and waste 
their time making repeated visits to government offices. 

Latvia: Ventspils City Council -AVANTI Drives Uptake of E-Government 
Services
[ http://www.microsoft.com/resources/casestudies/CaseStudy.asp?
CaseStudyID=521 ]
Ventspils City Council in Latvia is reaching more citizens with its 
online service offerings thanks to a collaborative pan-European 
project with other municipal councils, Microsoft and Fujitsu. The 
initiative, called AVANTI, enables visitors to the Ventspils Web 
site to interact with an animated character called an avatar. This 
has built in voice recognition and speech technology, which enables 
it to understand and respond to spoken queries relating to e-
government information or services, such as online licence 
applications. 

Philippines: eBoto 
[ http://eboto.org/ ]
A movement to inform and empower Filipinos in politics through the 
Internet. The organization strives to arm every Filipino involved in 
the electoral process with adequate information about candidates for 
election, as well as provide a forum for each individual to 
communicate with these candidates. Through this project, eBoto aims 
to provide a medium for concerned Filipino voters to get to know 
candidates in terms of concrete issues, platforms, and principle 
rather than mere personality and posturing.

Peru: Automated Public Registry
[ http://www.orlc.gob.pe/homepage.asp ]
Peru's public registry-and many of its problems-have existed since 
1888. The last major change at the registry was in 1970 when it 
graduated from handwritten to typed records. The agency?s many 
problems-such as the length of time it took to send a certificate 
and the illegal sales of homes to more than one buyer-were well 
known, but viewed as an unfortunate reality. But with automation, 
the user-friendly website (www.orlc.gob.pe) instilled confidence in 
a new generation of customers.


PUBLICATIONS: 
Browse 120 publications on DigitalGovernance.org Publications 
section at:
http://65.110.68.184/artman/publish/publications.shtml 

Recent Additions: 

Pre and Post Internet Activities towards e-governance- the Sri 
Lankan Experience
[ http://www.cicc.or.jp/english/hyoujyunka/15-19.pdf ]
S. T. Nandasara, Sri Lanka

One of the main demarcation points of pre Internet era in e�V
governance in Sri Lanka was the introduction of Computers for 
assisting the Election commissioner for counting votes in the 1982 
Presidential Election. For this project, BBC microcomputers were 
used. Since then to-date, the computer have being assisting the 
Election Commissioner for the release of election results of all the 
elections that were held in Sri Lanka without a single break. 

Latin America and the Caribbean: Democracy online
[ http://www.iadb.org/idbamerica/index.cfm?thisid=69 ]
Growing numbers of citizens in Latin America and the Caribbean are 
finding that better government is just a keystroke away. Governments 
throughout the region are putting information and communication 
technology to work to serve their citizens more efficiently and to 
open up the workings of government to public view. At the same time, 
they are demonstrating the benefits of these technologies by helping 
more people learn how to use computers and by increasing access to 
them. 

Mexico-Project E-Local: Internet for All Municipalities
[ 
http://www.developmentgateway.org/download/221756/Elocal_ITG_Case.pdf
 ]
E-Local is promoting access to public information in a governmental 
system that historically has been closed to citizens. The purpose of 
this project is to improve communication among the different 
structures of government and between those structures and the 
citizenry at large. It is the first effort of a federal 
administration to encourage the use of IT in municipalities in order 
to strengthen democratic governance, improve municipal management 
tools, and promote the building, within the local sphere, of 
an "authentic federalism" in Mexico.

Final report of Online Consultation In GOL-IN Countries - 
Initiatives to foster e-democracy
[ http://governments-online.org/articles/17.shtml ]
The report shows that governments around the globe are actively 
promoting online consultations in order to strengthen democracy and 
development. The report provides guidance for governments that wish 
to establish a productive form of online public consultations. In 
order to achieve this, knowledge, initiatives and experience already 
present in this field are clustered and made available.

Role of Mobile Communication for Effective e-Governance
[ http://www.mgsipap.org/egov-
conference/Post_Conference/conf_Papers/Papers/Yogesh_Dharminder.pdf ]
But all efforts at e-governance would be futile if information is 
not available to decision makers/ administrators and a common user 
as and where required. In order to do so mobile communication system 
can play a very important role in providing information as and where 
required. In this paper we have discussed how mobile communication 
system can be used for effective e-governance by suggesting methods 
of providing information to decision makers as and where required.


EVENTS: 
Browse upcoming and past events on DigitalGovernance.org Events 
section at:
http://65.110.68.184/artman/publish/events.shtml 

Recent Additions: 

E-Government and Sectoral Development in Caribbean States: "Charting 
an Agenda for Action
[ http://www.comnet-it.org/news/future.html ]
10-12 February 2004, St. Lucia
The Commonwealth Secretariat, through its Governance and 
Institutional Development Division (GIDD), is organising this 
workshop in conjunction with the Government of St Lucia for the 
region's policy makers, senior public service management and private 
sector and other institutional stakeholders likely to be impacted by 
the deployment of e-Government throughout the region. 

The 3rd International Conference on Information Technology and 
Economic Development
[ http://www.intercedconferences.org/27256_44787.asp ]
3-5 March 2004, Accra, Ghana
The theme of the conference is "The Challenges of ICT development: 
Policy, Strategies, Equity and Access." The gathering provides a 
neutral ground for government, academia and civil society actors to 
dialogue, re-educate each other and build a new and positive culture 
for collaboration and development. Dialogue amongst different 
participants bring different perspectives to common problems and 
offers insights on how to translate information technology 
innovations into practical and meaningful results.

XXVIth International Congress of Administrative Sciences on E-
Governance: Challenges and Opportunities for Democracy, 
Administration and Law 
[ http://www.iiasiisa.be/iias/aicor/aikorea.htm ]
14-18 July 2004, Seoul, Korea
Workshops 1) E-Governance: effects on civil society, transparency 
and democracy; 2) E-Governance: changes in administrative structures 
and processes; 3) E-Governance: perspectives for countries in 
transition and development; 4) E-Governance and the evolution of law.


_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to