[Winona Online Democracy]



I've made my views known on the high school remodeling project, but I want to also comment on the process as I've seen it discussed here on WOD.  Many people have said:
 
* They were not aware of the project until late in the process
* They were not invited to discuss or comment on the project
* They could not get information on the project
 
In my experience in city planning projects, which often involve an entire community, it is essential to identify the "stakeholders" early on; to set forth a process for making decisions; to invite, inform, and broadcast the meetings and decision points in the process; and to make available background information and meeting minutes.  When this is done right, people can disagree with a decision, but can respect the way it was made and those who made it.  When this is not done right, I can't tell you the number of times I've been accused of "secret deals" and "hidden agendas".  From what I can tell, this was not done, or not done well, in the high school process.
 
It appears there was considerable community discussion about what to do generally about school budget shortfalls and space needs, and there was a widely discussed referendum.  As it got to exploring specific recommendations on using the high school, informing and including teachers and students at a minimum - and ideally the wider community - should have been part of the process.  I agree with Superintendent Durand's comment that we don't let the kids make the decisions, but it doesn't mean we keep them out of the process entirely.
 
For example, if the city wanted to build a new public building they could select a site, buy it, design a building, and approve it through typical public hearings.  Local ordinance requires property owners within a certain distance to be notified of the action if it needs zoning approval.  As neighbors who have to live with the future building next to them, they have a "stake" in the project. These neighbors are not given veto power, or even a vote in the project, but they are invited to express their views.  When a significant portion of the high school building is to be used for a building project, the same rules should apply, not from a legal standpoint, but from a common sense community relations standpoint.
 
It is always easier to decide a project with fewer people involved. But often better solutions come out of involving more people, in the messy, difficult, frustrating process we call democracy.
 
Phil Carlson, Mpls
 
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to