[Winona Online Democracy]

Title: School funding


Craig Brooks asked for information on the PHASED speaker, Charles Spieker, from MN Dept of Ed(see disclaimer at bottom).   I've pasted in the handout he shared after his presentation.    Randy Schenkat

ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES FOR EDUCATION
(A Collection of Thoughts to Stimulate Discussion)
c.a.speiker
 
Across the country and in virtually every state, discussions are underway on the topic of
funding education. Within those discussions one is hard-pressed to find more than a handful of people who will entertain school finance in any way other than raising taxes at the state and local levels; generating new or greater fees for parents and students; and, getting involved in a myriad of fundraising activities. Clearly, local boards and administrators have to put on their business hats and create alternative funding sources. But, more than that, they need to totally shift their paradigms to allow for a new schooling organization to emerge.
 
The State of Schools
 
Thomas Friedman in the New York Times quoted Bill Gates in a speech at the summit of the nation's governors. ..."American high schools are obsolete.. .1 mean that our high schools- even when they are working exactly as designed- cannot teach our kids what they need to know today." Friedman said that for the first time in history, we are going to face competition from low-wage, high-human-capital communities embedded within India, China and Asia.
 
Do we have the motivation and leadership in the state to make fundamental changes to the way things are going? Can we change our notions of funding completely so that survival and then quality education will grow in to great? Check out Jim Collins Good to Great.
 
There is no culture in the schooling or legislative process to get to a discussion of the big ideas,so we may be doomed to traditional mediocrity. Excuses include:
 
Don't rock the boat. (the current risk-free culture)
There really isn't anything wrong (never mind the data).
But, we have always done it that way.
My contract is quite clear on my duties.
 
Where is the passion and drive to do the BEST?
 
Is there any group of employees in the traditional schools that would be willing to risk it all to move to a concept of new funding and new products? Parents are! Look at the charters. Dr. Ouchi in Making Schools Work suggests that all principals become entrepreneur.
 
All discussion on alternative funding has been a regrinding of the sausage meat. Funding is state, federal and local, ...it is general and categorical.. .so, we move the pieces around within this precast and arcane framework. A legislator can make political gains by promising some categorical aid for schools, buying technology and a host of other "red herrings" to get votes. If the bill gets passed, the money goes to the district and gets lost, rather than let the money go to the buildings to get the jobs done.
 
How about this. ...........
Privatize all schools and make the corporations figure out their own funding
Fund all children with a revenue voucher from casinos and other gambling
Apply the 1/2 billion in funds for extra curricular activities to more productive ends
Turn all schools into a form of charter school with no more than 200 children per site, run
by people who have "special skills."
All schools are providing services 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 12 months a year.
Public employees participate in the generation of revenue for the common good
 
Conditions necessary to Launch the Discussion-the safe one!
 
If alternatives to traditional state aid and local levies are to be seriously considered,
WITHOUT GOING AROUND THE BEND, then several conditions must be set in motion prior to that activity. Some of those conditions that need to exist are:
1.   All the partners in education must participate fully.
2.  Alternative funding must have a return large enough to warrant the expenditure of valued and scarce resources.
3.  The discussion of alternative funding must explore all dimensions of the topic.
4.  Employee unions need to be apprised of the possibility of alternative funding.
5.  A fundamental shift in mission paradigms must be entertained.
6.  A fundamental shift in operations paradigms must be entertained.
7.  A fundamental shift in geo-political paradigms must be entertained.
 
Criteria for Generating Options-the safe ones!
1.  A funding source is sustainable over time.
2.  A funding source has a large return on investment justifying the investment).
 
Examples of Alternative Sources of Funding
 
Restructure state funding and concepts
Foundations, 'Fees, Services
Cost centers for teaching areas. Computer lab (41% of schools offer some on-line learning)
 
Contracts to other agencies, organizations (administration and bus garage) teach businesses specific skills needed (post secondary options)
 
No part of this topic delivered either in writing or orally is intended to in any way represent the views of the Department of Education. Further, it is not quite clear if many of the ideas represent the views of the speaker.

-- 
Randy Schenkat   1358 Skyline Dr. Winona, Mn 55987     507-452-7168
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to