[Winona Online Democracy]

Paul Double asked a lot of questions in his post about eminent domain in the
aftermath of the recent Kelo v. New London Supreme Court case.  The case has
attracted a lot well-deserved attention to the issues of community
aspirations, economic development, public good, and private property rights.
My answers to Paul's questions (on behalf of all you Winonans) are mostly
"Yes, maybe, depending."  I am assuming from Paul's tone and his previous
posts that his answers would be mostly "No, of course not!"

A useful analogy is surgery.  Don't ever cut your flesh - unless of course
there's a good reason to - then go ahead quickly, carefully, and
intelligently.  Same with eminent domain - don't ever take someone's
property, unless of course you need to for some large community issue.
Economic development can be one of those issues - that is what the Supreme
Court said in New London.

I have practiced city planning and been involved in dozens of eminent domain
cases in the last 29 years, testifying in front of condemnation hearings and
district court juries, mostly on behalf of private property owners.  I have
taught seminars and made conference presentations on planning, zoning, and
development issues for most of those 29 years, several a year, to city
staff, planning commissioners, city council members, county board members,
and town board members (that is of course when the elected decision makers
actually show up - mostly they send their staff and appointed
representatives, assuming they themselves know it all already).  I also
teach part of a course every other year as an adjunct faculty member at the
University of St. Thomas on developing concept plans in eminent domain
cases.

The New London case has attracted attention because it appears to many to go
too far in allowing cities to snatch someone's private home and turn it over
to a greedy developer.  As in most high-level legal rulings, the details are
more complex and the judgments not so easy.  But on the basis of an
emotional appeal, Winona (or any other city) should not avoid using its
power of eminent domain, simply because a few people are victims or are in
the way of larger plans.  On the contrary I would urge Winona (and most
other cities) to have clearer and more detailed visions of what they want
and go after them confidently, carefully, aggressively, if need be.  Too
often cities are reactive vs. proactive, and play catch up to development
projects that bully their way into the landscape (poster child: Wal Mart).

In the shadow of the New London case everyone needs to take a deep breath
and realize that each state can set limits on what constitutes a public
purpose and the use of eminent domain, and each city can do likewise.  To
assume the sky is falling because one community in Connecticut had a grand
scheme and actually implemented it is overreaching.  Winona can do likewise.
You should have grand visions, clear plans, and implementation steps that
might include eminent domain takings in certain situations.  We undergo
minor and major surgeries all the time on our own bodies with less hoopla.

Phil Carlson, Mpls

P.S. The issue of selling park land is a little different, and I'm not sure
why it is in Paul's post.  If a city takes land for one purpose (park) and
then turns around and sells it immediately for private development, that is
wrong.  Is this happening in Winona?  Conditions change over time, and no
city should be bound to keep every square foot of public land public
forever.  The city should have a clear plan for providing adequate public
park land at all times - but this plan might include different elements at
different times, contracting here, expanding there.

----------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Paul Double
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 9:11 AM
To: Online Democracy
Subject: [Winona] Should Eminent Domain be used in Winona other than
forroads & utilities?


[Winona Online Democracy]

The recent Supreme Court in New London, Connecticut opened the door for more
government control over the rights of property owners.  Now Washington DC
wants big box stores and is willing to use eminent domain to achieve it ---
see

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/11/AR2005071101
488.html

The question is --- should it be used in Winona and what is acceptable?
Should it be used to sell park lands to developers for residential or
commercial developments?  Should low taxable property be taken for the
development of condos?

Can the political will of any council be the controlling factor to preserve
or destroy historic properties?

Can and should it be used to shut down one business because it doesn't fit
the image or that could be replaced by something which would generate higher
property taxes?

Can if be used to force a property owner to spend substantial funds to fit
the picture or model and if you don't to seize your property to sell it to
someone who will?

This ruling opened a can of worms that could affect you and your vision of
the potential power of local government that could be used to change a
community into anything those in power desire and are pushed by a small but
driven group of supporters.

Do you see it coming to river city??? Are you a player, a pawn or a
spectator?


Paul Double

_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page
at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to