[Winona Online Democracy]

Kelly,

This is helpful, however it is still concrete and is still not an
official report that someone from the community can open up and read
without either:

a.  make their own makeshift report from numbers like this that they
have heard to be true... that have been filtered from the plethora of
ramble such of this, or

b.  take off work and go to the superintendents office, wade through the
politics of actually getting "permission" to see public documents... and
by the time one has the documents of interest there is no time left to
view them.

On a second note, you mentioned that closing Rollingstone would be the
board's next move because simply the enrollment there is down?  Would it
be safe to say that it would be up had Principal Davis's proposal of
annexing the Woodhaven area been passed?  If that school closes is the
district going to sell it outright then?  It seems to me that since the
school is not completely paid for the district still has a significant
fixed cost associated with that building.  It is also hard for me to
believe that the board does not see any growth potential in that school
with the current developments going up on that side of Winona and the
imminent division that is going to be built in Rollingstone.

It also somewhat upsets me that this would be the decision after what I
heard Larry told me in the 12 on Tuesday as to the reasons why say
Central isn't going to be closed.  Which for all intense and purpose is
to merely prevent it from being chartered.  Nice.


Toby

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kelly Herold
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 8:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Winona] Mr. Schmidt

[Winona Online Democracy]

Mr. Schmidt I will attempt to answer some of your questions and or 
help you find information.

Part of my challenge is that I have several folks that I am trying to 
help and by no means intend to minimize your concerns.

If you could would you be so kind as to list your questions in terms 
of importance and enumerate them.  In this way I can answer at least 
your most significant concerns and move from there.

While I am not sure we can convince anyone to vote for the referendum 
if when one considers folks have a myriad of frustrations, confusion, 
or grudges dating back, at least from one of my constituents, to 
1972.  Tonight  I read where one writer is angry about used desks not 
being reused and seemingly has sworn off SD board.  I encourage her 
to run for the school board to help.  I respect her opinion - and can 
only guess why old desks weren't reused.  Outdated? Out of code? 
Cheaper to replace than repair?  I cannot answer her.  And if she 
decides to vote against the referendum on that point I can only say - 
she has that right.

To begin - thank you for your input - it is appreciated.  I feel this 
is an especially arduous  task knowing that WOD participants are by 
and large seeming to vote waiting to vote no.  That saddens me. 
While this task seems fruitless - I am encouraged to read you are 
willing to engage.

I am relatively new to the board and so some of what you ask will 
require me to double check info etc.  I have a relative short period 
to work on this other than every night, very early mornings, and 
week-ends.  So please bear with me.

A lot of this is redundant - so please bear with me on that too.

The operating budget of 2.5 million is what the tax payers currently 
pay to run the district.  The state has continued to shift the burden 
back to the localities.  The operating budget covers copious SD 
obligations - like bussing, salaries, heat, lights, on and on.

That 2.5 support was approved by the taxpayers and the clock on that 
income is almost out.  Without this income the district generates 
something ridiculously small - like $50,000.  That number is 
something I would have to check - but I believe it is near that - at 
any rate not enough to run the school.

The current referendum is asking for 3.7 to cover the previously 
mentioned items.  The jump of 1.2 million will help cover inflation, 
increased fuel costs, increased insurance costs and allow us to 
reinstate programs that have left this SD bare bones.

Does this help?

Please let me know and let me know what other five or so questions I 
can try to answer.
-- 
Kelly Herold, PhD
Associate Professor of Communication Studies
Winona State University
Winona, MN
55987

507 - 457 - 5242
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact
page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to