[Winona Online Democracy]



It would be no surprise if the technical college were the most common choice of WAPS students using the Postsecondary Enrollment Options. According to the Minnesota Office of Higher Education, in 2004-2005, two-year community and technical colleges drew 4,948 PSEO students, state universities drew 776, the University of Minnesota drew 947 students, and private colleges drew 1,042.

 

Why do students attend institutions of higher education? A recent study of PSEO students in the metro area by Joe Nathan and the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs indicated that 94 percent of students believed they learned more in college classes than in their regular high school classes, 92 percent felt they saved money, and 91 percent believed they saved time.

 

Craig makes an excellent point on the need for communities and schools to work together in helping children with problems. This country is experiencing a significant growth in the number of governmental and quasi-governmental agencies that have joined school districts (sometimes with district encouragement, sometimes without) in dealing with the wide array of issues that are involved in the education of children. This joint activity is especially notable in big cities.

 

With regard to the alternative learning centers, Minneapolis provides a good example of the dispersion of educational responsibilities to the community. Within the Minneapolis School District, 21 of the 27 alternative schools are administered by community agencies under the auspices of the independent Metropolitan Federation of Alternative Schools. Students remain enrolled in the Minneapolis District, but the running of the schools, including the selection of teachers and staff,  is left to particular agencies. As you would expect, students in these schools have difficulties whose resolution is believed to require expertise and attention well beyond the competencies of the school system itself. The ultimate success of these "Contract Alternative Schools" is unknown, but the move reflects attempts to deal effectively with a social problem that heretofore has been resistant to solution by school districts themselves. 

 

Roy Nasstrom

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Winona] alc

[Winona Online Democracy]


I thought I heard a WAPS admin. person say that the majority of PSEO use was for the VoTech College.  I have not idea how to access that info. except contacting WAPS.  I wish more school admin. and Board members were on this listserv.

I am on the Comm. Educ. Advisory Committee and I have been hearing about the plan to move much of their operation into the old Big O, where the ALC is, for a long time.  So, I wasn't surprised by the news they were going to move and that ALC was going to move.  I know some school people did not want the ALC near small kids programs and seemed to want it out of sight because of the bad PR with the kids standing around on the street smoking, etc.  So, some of the possibilities considered were rejected for those reasons is my guess.  The place planned is by and near one the landlord already leases to the school -- it is called the Greenhouse Program for spec. educ. EBD high school kids.  (Greenhouse simply refers to what the property used to be.)  In my opinion all the school programs should be smoke free.  Kids at ALC and Greenhouse are allowed to smoke and I sispect staff think banning it will cause problems.  I have heard that argument regarding adult psych. wards in hospitals and the results of smoking bans has not resulted in problems. 

There are two more comments I wanted to make on this topic.

  • The State's system for funding public education is not good and not reliable.  A part of the system has School Boards treating property taxation as a right and almost as an obligation to tax as much as the Legislature allows.  I'd guess that comes from all the squeezing they've been subjected to and being told how wonderful the State is to ALLOW them to put various items on the local tax levy.  Counties and Cities have been subject to tax levy limits (only allowed to go up x%) off and on over the years.  Every time Counties would complain about State mandates the State would threaten levy limits -- basically saying shut up or we will leave the mandates AND limit your ability to raise the money to fund them.  My point with this is that it appears to be in the culture of public education in Minnesota that maximizing all possible property tax revenue is an expectation and they are shocked that the public would object.  Politically it is a game that catches the children in the middle.  The Minnesota Legislature are experts at trying to make funding decisions look like they are NOT their responsibility when in fact it is their decisions that force the issue.
  • And lastly, several people on this list have raised the primary question of why we have an ALC, what programming do these children need and why have kids been sent there or choose to go there.  When resources get cut and ability to handle tough situations is reduced, the pressure is on to move the problems out of the mainstream.  The Greenhouse, ALC, Leadership Program, Day Treatment, out of town placement, home schooling and expulsion are all actions that can be motivated by sheer survival for the basic education needs of the majority.  I think our community needs to work together to find workable alternatives (within the school buildings and outside them) for the variety of problems children bring to the table.  It is a two way street -- others being involved and schools being open to that and all working to create a shared sense of the problems and their solutions.  Public schools are not use to others helping so it is a new thing for them to be involved in cooperative efforts.  Many will disagree with me on this but that is my opinion based on my experiences and this is in a community known for its wonderful track record of inter-agency cooperation when compared to other places in Minnesota.



Craig Brooks



----- Original Message ----
From: Chris Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 09:23:50
Subject: [Winona] (no subject)

[Winona Online Democracy]

Leslie made a point about the "VoTech" now being a 2 year college.  What about PSEO at Winona State?  Couldn't that be an option for those that "don't want to go to college"?
 
"Students who go to ALCs do want to complete high school, but have not been successful at doing it in a more conventional educational environment" 
 
Leslie, what percent graduate from the ALC compared to the WSHS?
 
Chris Nelson





_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to