[Winona Online Democracy]

A Little background on the American Enterprise Institute, the group behind the
Skeptic's Guide...


There is overwhelming scientific consensus that greenhouse gases emitted by
human activity are causing global average temperatures to rise. Conservative
think tanks are trying to undermine this conclusion with a disinformation
campaign employing “reports” designed to look like a counterbalance to
peer-reviewed studies, skeptic propaganda masquerading as journalism, and
events like the AEI luncheon that Author Michael Crichton addressed. The think
tanks provide both intellectual cover for those who reject what the best
science currently tells us, and ammunition for conservative policymakers like
Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the chair of the Environment and Public Works
Committee, who calls global warming “a hoax.”

This concerted effort reflects the shared convictions of free-market, and thus
antiregulatory, conservatives. But there’s another factor at play. In addition
to being supported by like-minded individuals and ideologically sympathetic
foundations, these groups are funded by ExxonMobil, the world’s largest oil
company. Mother Jones has tallied some 40 ExxonMobil-funded organizations that
either have sought to undermine mainstream scientific findings on global
climate change or have maintained affiliations with a small group of “skeptic”
scientists who continue to do so. Beyond think tanks, the count also includes
quasi-journalistic outlets like Tech CentralStation.com (a website providing
“news, analysis, research, and commentary” that received $95,000 from
ExxonMobil in 2003), a FoxNews.com columnist, and even religious and civil
rights groups. In total, these organizations received more than $8 million
between 2000 and 2003 (the last year for which records are available; all
figures below are for that range unless otherwise noted). ExxonMobil chairman
and CEO Lee Raymond serves as vice chairman of the board of trustees for the
AEI, which received $960,000 in funding from ExxonMobil. The AEI-Brookings
Institution Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, which officially hosted
Crichton, received another $55,000. When asked about the event, the center’s
executive director, Robert Hahn—who’s a fellow with the AEI—defended it,
saying, “Climate science is a field in which reasonable experts can disagree.”
(By contrast, on the day of the event, the Brookings Institution posted a
scathing critique of Crichton’s book.)

During the question-and-answer period following his speech, Crichton drew an
analogy between believers in global warming and Nazi eugenicists. “Auschwitz
exists because of politicized science,” Crichton asserted, to gasps from some
in the crowd. There was no acknowledgment that the AEI event was part of an
attempt to do just that: politicize science. The audience at hand was certainly
full of partisans. Listening attentively was Myron Ebell, a man recently
censured by the British House of Commons for “unfounded and insulting criticism
of Sir David King, the Government’s Chief Scientist.” Ebell is the global
warming and international policy director of the Competitive Enterprise
Institute (CEI), which has received a whopping $1,380,000 from ExxonMobil.
Sitting in the back of the room was Christopher Horner, the silver-haired
counsel to the Cooler Heads Coalition who’s also a CEI senior fellow. Present
also was Paul Driessen, a senior fellow with the Committee for a Constructive
Tomorrow ($252,000) and the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise ($40,000
in 2003). Saying he’s “heartened that ExxonMobil and a couple of other groups
have stood up and said, ‘this is not science,’” Driessen, who is white, has
made it his mission to portray Kyoto-style emissions regulations as an attack
on people of color—his recent book is entitled Eco-Imperialism: Green Power,
Black Death (see “Black Gold?”). Driessen has also written about the role that
think tanks can play in helping corporations achieve their objectives. Such
outlets “can provide research, present credible independent voices on a host of
issues, indirectly influence opinion and political leaders, and promote
responsible social and economic agendas,” he advised companies in a 2001 essay
published in Capital PR News. “They have extensive networks among scholars,
academics, scientists, journalists, community leaders and politicians…. You
will be amazed at how much they do with so little.”

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/05/some_like_it_hot.html

Bryon Bothun

_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to