What statistics are you capturing? For example... Src IP Addr Protocol Port Upload pkts Download pkts ------------ ---------- ------ ----------- ------------- 192.168.1.1 TCP 80 2341 2419866 192.168.1.1 UDP 5000 987 1026 192.168.1.2 TCP 80 1298 1672340
DC pro2c wrote: > I'm trying to make an active list of computer's ports with download and > upload statistics. So i need 2 instances for 1 port (download & upload) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Chang > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 7:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Multiple instances > > Could you use a single filter with 'OR' statements to fulfill the 200 > conditions you wish to capture for? Then, handle the resulting packets in > your own application? Or will the 200 conditions just get every packet > anyway? > > Could you describe what your application is trying to do? > > DC > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "pro2c" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:25 AM > Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Multiple instances > > > >> It's developed in VB.NET 2.0 >> I optimized as far as I could. Maybe .NET is not a fast platform. >> Can send source code to someone who can do VB >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gianluca Varenni >> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 6:13 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Multiple instances >> >> A packet flow if 1.5MB/s is really low. The problem was probably in the >> logic of your application. If I were you, I would definitely review your >> application design to understand what the bottleneck was. >> >> Have a nice day >> GV >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "pro2c" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:02 AM >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Multiple instances >> >> >>> Yes, this was my first attempt but at full DL speed (~1,5 MB/s) the CPU >>> usage was to high :( since the packet flow is too large/fast >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gianluca Varenni >>> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:59 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Multiple instances >>> >>> If memory is an issue, then the best solution is opening a single >>> instance >>> of the WinPcap device, and do your own filtering and demultiplexing in >>> user >>> mode. This could have the good side effect of having less kernel-user >>> mode >>> transitions to bring the packets to user mode applications. >>> >>> Have a nice day >>> GV >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "pro2c" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:37 AM >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Multiple instances >>> >>> >>>> No, not 200 instances of my app but 200 instances of winpcap device to >>>> have >>>> 200 different filters (for each port). >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Chang >>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:08 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Multiple instances >>>> >>>> Why are you running 200 instances of your application on a single >>>> computer? Do you have 200 NICs? Maybe you can change your application >>>> to do more processing in one instance (i.e. multi-threading). >>>> >>>> DC >>>> >>>> pro2c wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm having some problems with multiple instances. When I load 200 >>>>> instances the memory use of my app reaches 100MB. I'm guessing that >>>>> every instance reserves some mem for itself. >>>>> >>>>> Can this be lowered somehow? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Winpcap-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Winpcap-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Winpcap-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Winpcap-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Winpcap-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Winpcap-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Winpcap-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Winpcap-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users > > _______________________________________________ > Winpcap-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users > _______________________________________________ Winpcap-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
