> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luke Brennan [mailto:lukeb@;microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] WinPcap on NT4sp6/ALPHA ?
>
>
> OK, so what "support" is required from Microsoft?

oh, for example an Alpha in order to test it properly, plus money to pay
someone to do the porting :-)


> Let me know what that is and I'll ask about it...
>
> I'll reverse the process from x86
> into C or alpha-assembler I suppose.
>
> I was just hoping that I didn't have to :-)

I believe you have to start learning Alpha assembler :-))

        fulvio


>
> Luke.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fulvio Risso [mailto:risso@;polito.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 8:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Luke Brennan
> Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] WinPcap on NT4sp6/ALPHA ?
>
>
> It could be, if Microsoft provide us support for the porting.
>
>       fulvio
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luke Brennan [mailto:lukeb@;microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 00:24
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [WinPcap-users] WinPcap on NT4sp6/ALPHA ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I've just started into this to get the SIMH VAX emulator
> > running on my XL366/ALPHA  (NT4sp6 / Linux 7.2).
> > I downloaded WinPcap 3.0alpha4 sources along with the DDK, SDK and
> VC++
> > 6.0,
> > and to my dismay it's got inline _ASM intel assembler.
> > Is there a non-assembler version for NT/ALPHA available?
> >
> > Luke
> >
> >
> > ======================
> >  This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
> >  http://www.mail-archive.com/winpcap-users@;winpcap.polito.it/
> >
> >  To unsubscribe use
> >  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe
> > ======================
> >
>



==================================================================
 This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/winpcap-users@;winpcap.polito.it/

 To unsubscribe use 
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
==================================================================

Reply via email to